Designed by Ryue Nishizawa of SANAA, Tokyo garden and House is of floating concrete planes and glass partitions.
Tokyo is a metropolis of contrasts. From Zen temples to temples of Mammon, falling-down timber shacks following to polished glass towers, and tiny pocket gardens, Tokyo has everything. This four-storey home, Tokyo Garden and House by Ryue Nishizawa seems to suit proper in by definition. The articulation for this building is a sequence of concrete slabs which are apparently floating. Although on closer inspection there are three different shapes of concrete columns holding up the building in addition to a skinny nook metallic column − Le Corbusier’s Dom-Ino body revisited 99 years on. The bottom is a caravan-like association of seating, storage, kitchen and eating. Moreover, a light-weight metallic staircase connects all of the floors.
The ground floor accommodates a tiny bedroom and an L-shaped open balcony with an out of doors assembly room. On the second floor, the stair turns into enclosed. Also, there may be an out of doors area resulting in a self-contained restroom on the back. Whereas, the third floor has a second bedroom, a non-public terrace to the entrance. It also has a linear stair and once more outdoors on the back, main as much as the roof terrace. Right here around cut-out within the roof slab presents a Modernist architectural motif seen from the road.
It’s troublesome to disregard the mundane considerations that come up from minimal railings on the staircase and the roof terrace. What makes this little building extraordinary are the plants, primarily in pots. They not only animate the facade but penetrates deep into the home. The architect’s drawings of the part are cartoons exhibiting no facades, only a sequence of horizontal cabinets with bushes, crops and the odd chair and desk.
An additional layer of domesticity is present with net curtains that enable some type of privateness. It may be a nod to Shigeru Ban’s Curtain Home, additionally in Tokyo, completed in 1995. The difference is within the party − Ban’s home nonetheless differentiates between inside and outdoors. Whereas the Tokyo Garden and House are way too porous. Certainly, the bottom among the exterior areas is definitely earth, and the path to the toilet requires you to go outside. You may be barefoot, take a number of steps before then slide the frosted door to return inside once more.
We are maybe used to seeing the Japanese home as inward-looking, or a home for wanting into. This house additionally questions the belief of permanence. Is it a pop-up home, right here at this time and gone tomorrow? What if the other owner who doesn’t like gardening takes all the greenery away and turns the house into a less beautiful and different premise? In some ways, the possibility of the greenery provides to the delicate nature of the entire development. Concrete is a well-recognized sight throughout the materials of the town, and so are balconies filled with crops and flowers. However, here we have a poetic essay that collides these two worlds right into an image that’s fantastical and yet like home.
Design Philosophy and considerations
The aim additionally interrogates the concept of the home and the way we reside. Is it having the ordinary challenge that’s luxurious, or is it the vertically stacked self-contained world that indicates, unconventional and privateness?
There are problems with privateness with bedrooms open to the stair, questions of seasonal occupation − in spite of the chilly weather in Tokyo. It’s disappointing to see that the internal climate is managed through wall air-conditioners with the required chiller on the roof. It could have been great to suppose that by some means the plantation had an impact on the microclimate of the house or maybe it does? Much less of a machine to reside in and extra of dwelling equipment; a propagator for crops and folks.
Modernity and Tokyo Garden and House
Tokyo Garden and House by Ryue Nishizawa is of the second. Just like a lot bigger 1111 Lincoln Highway mission by Herzog & de Meuron in Miami (AR June 2010). This tiny building performs with the financial system of the concrete slab as an organising system. It then inhabits it in an extraordinary method − enjoying with conventions of outdoor and inside, facade and inside, nature and artifice. It represents Modernity and embraces its legacy. Its graphic presence on the road calls for study, whereas as soon as you are inside the town disappear into a sequence of views resolved by nature.
The designer finishes and minimal detailing demand a strictly simple way of life. Also, at the same time requiring the owner to actually water all the plants. This can’t be seen as a mannequin but as a prototype. It appears like a name for motion, difficult how we wish to or must be living in the cities.
Share you views on this case study.